Monday, October 5, 2026 Edition 09 · Special edition Supported by Phantom

Stories from Tech,
Finance and beyond

La Sobremesa

Every Monday with
Carlitos & StarPlatinum

Solana killed Robinhood Chain?

By StarPlatinum

· 2 min read

“Robinhood Chain is over.” “Liquidity is going back to Solana.” “$STONK proved it.”

Rasmr has been one of the people pushing that argument, and I understand where it comes from. $STONK becoming one of the strongest trades in this part of the market while attention rotates toward Solana is obviously worth watching.

What I don’t understand is how we went from that to declaring an entire chain thesis dead. One project doing incredibly well on Solana doesn’t delete everything Robinhood has spent the last year building. We constantly do this in crypto: a chain has a bad week and it’s dead, another gets a runner and it’s the new home of liquidity.

Solana being strong doesn’t require Robinhood to become weak.

We literally watched a version of this during the previous cycle with Ethereum and Solana, when Solana captured enormous speculative attention without making Ethereum irrelevant. They ended up serving overlapping markets with completely different strengths.

I think Robinhood and Solana can coexist for an even more obvious reason: Robinhood’s biggest catalyst was never PONS. The reason I’ve spent months talking about Robinhood Chain is the thing Robinhood originally built it for, Stocks, the same thing sitting at the center of the SEC announcement Carlitos mentioned above.

What a catalyst.

Read that again and then remember what we’re arguing about. We’re debating whether Robinhood Chain is finished because a memecoin is doing well on Solana during the same week the SEC opened a five-year experimental path for tokenized US stocks to trade onchain.

I’m definitely not throwing away the Robinhood thesis because Solana had a good week. Actually, I think the more interesting possibility is that attention rotates between them. Solana already owns an enormous part of crypto-native speculation.

Robinhood is trying to connect that world with people who might eventually be trading NVDA, private companies, RWAs and whatever financial products developers build around those assets.

If those two markets are both active this cycle, traders aren’t going to sign a fucking exclusivity agreement with a blockchain. They’ll go where the opportunity is. Just like they always do.

More from La Sobremesa 07

More in Markets

AI and SI, classic sh*t

Elon influence is no news, and he may have a better leverage in convincing us that AI is now to be called Superintelligence, lol.

By Kaito Dan · 1 min read

Free, every Monday

Pull up a chair.

The whole edition lands in your inbox once a week. Subscribe on Substack, it's free.

Subscribe to La Sobremesa